X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:38:18 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: simple test triggers fork errs for me in 5/27 snapshot
Message-ID: <20060529153818.GB12157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <022d01c6830f$61ca8c10$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <023801c68320$50831d80$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <023801c68320$50831d80$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Anyone got any good ideas?

I've rescanned this thread to reacquaint myself with why I was
semi-ignoring it and I've found that the data points are 1) it fails
with 4/27 and one subsequent snapshots 2) it works with the 4/3
snapshot 3) it fails with the 3/9 snapshot.

I was hoping that somebody besides me would offer the obvious
observation that if this truly stopped working at some point, then
knowing when it stopped working with less granularity than a 24 day
period would be the first step towards fixing the problem.

So, that's my good idea.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/