X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:51:33 +0200
From: Peter Ekberg <peda@lysator.liu.se>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: "fork problem" debugging
Message-ID: <20060529095133.GA18356@sellafield.lysator.liu.se>
References: <20060518023929.65449.qmail@web31310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0605172342490.19815@access1.cims.nyu.edu> <loom.20060528T233432-336@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <loom.20060528T233432-336@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 10:40:34PM +0000, Torfinn Ottesen wrote:
> <heavily snipped content>

<snipping some more>

>          I did this for three programs, prog1 (commercial, external),
>          prog2 (inhouse, compiled on Cygwin) and native cygwin prog3:
>          "echo". I claim that I saw increased increase memory usage 
>          for prog1 and prog2 - but not for the "echo" program.

Did you really fork for echo, or did you use a shell builtin by mistake?

/bin/echo is your friend...

Cheers,
Peter

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/