Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:05:00 -0700
From: clayne@anodized.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.5.19: changes have broken Qt3
Message-ID: <20060524100500.GK13907@ns1.anodized.com>
References: <044e01c67e8f$0abed720$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <447350C4.1080604@freenet.de> <20060523182326.GB6138@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4473607C.2070806@freenet.de> <44741E31.665A1B7@dessent.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44741E31.665A1B7@dessent.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:49:53AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Sigh.  We've been through this ad nauseum in the archives.  This is how
> it's supposed to work, there's nothing wrong here.  Gdb doesn't know any
> better though, and reports it as a SIGSEGV, when it is not.  Did you not
> notice that when you run the program outside of the debugger it does not
> fault?  If you use a recent Cygwin snapshot and a gdb built from CVS you
> see no such fault, because this defect in gdb has been fixed.
> 
> Brian

Actually, is this really a fault in gdb? Cygwin is throwing a SIGSEGV signal,
correct? GDB does what it's told, stops on SIGSEGV by default.

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/