X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:04:39 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: "Please don't discuss other, competing products here"
Message-ID: <20060523150439.GC9036@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20060522140033.GA17013@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <005d01c67e0b$4b22a6e0$1e10a8c0@holgerdanske.local> <20060523080414.GF13907@ns1.anodized.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060523080414.GF13907@ns1.anodized.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 01:04:15AM -0700, clayne@anodized.com wrote:
>On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:50:38PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
>> 3.  Last but not least, the open-source software (OSS) movement used to
>>     have at its core the concept of "Freedom", including "Freedom of
>>     Speech".  OSS projects were simply assumed by the OSS community to
>>     allow freedom of speech (within reason); those that did not invited
>>     protest and/or rejection.
>
>I too, do not see the issue with discussing 'competing' products here.
>What's the issue?

The OP posted the description of this mailing list but he skipped the
first sentence: "a high volume list for discussion of just about all
things related to the Cygwin community release." Discussions of how SFU
deals with newlines or how U/WIN works with ActiveState perl do not have
anything to do with the community release.

As I've previously stated, I don't mind restrained comparisons on the
order of "U/WIN allows chmod to work on FAT32 partitions could Cygwin
use the same technique?"  Relation of experiences with U/WIN or other
products both postive and negative are off-topic here.

As Dave Korn indicated, I set up the cygwin-talk list for this kind of
thing.  The only downside to using that forum is that sometime you have
to share your computer with a flatulant hippo.  That seems like a small
price to pay.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

