X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:56:56 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: How do I detect a failure in Make? Message-ID: <20060430005656.GC8373@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <10845a340604260701g2026a64fx5dac7fb5351b224a@mail.gmail.com> <444F8631.7000206@tibco.com> <10845a340604280111o48fff212n78286b8f78c539c9@mail.gmail.com> <44528E49.9020101@yahoo.com> <4453EBC0.5020307@byu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4453EBC0.5020307@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:42:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >According to Doyle Rhynard on 4/28/2006 3:51 PM: >> Use "remake" the make debugger >> It will allow you to step through the makefile and stop when an error is >> found. > >You know, remake is built by the same guy that does bashdb, and since I >maintain bashdb, I ought to at least consider ITP'ing remake (adding that >to my ever-growing list of TODO items). But first, it would be nice if we >had an active maintainer interested in porting the new make 3.81 to cygwin >(hmm, maybe another package I should ITP, if I had the time). No. There is no need for you to ITP packages that I maintain. What an odd notion. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/