X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 02:10:58 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: GCC 4.x+
Message-ID: <20060318071058.GA27498@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0603160045360.28991-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it> <4418AB38.B7D87B36@dessent.net> <441B8AB3.9080308@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <441BAEF9.8090404@myrealbox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <441BAEF9.8090404@myrealbox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:55:53PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
>I've heard of some reluctance among gcc developers to continue support 
>for cygwin.  There seems to be a lack of interest in problem solving, or 
>in overcoming the binutils bottleneck in the way of a 64-bit native 
>cygwin.

Huh?  Could you point me at a developer who is expressing reluctance?  I
know most of them and hang out on the gcc irc channel and no one has
said anything to me.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/