X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:07:44 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: d_ino bug in // Message-ID: <20060227180744.GA10711@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <022720061758.2378.44033DDA000153AC0000094A22073007930A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <022720061758.2378.44033DDA000153AC0000094A22073007930A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:58:50PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: >> >It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //. >> >Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced: >> >> A (somewhat) simple test case (patent pending) is nice but it really >> should be accompanied with an explanation of the problem. How about >> describing *in words* what you think is broken? > >It looks like Corinna already nailed the issue, but for the archive's >sake, my complaint was that under //, d_ino and st_ino did not match >properly. Thanks for the explanation. It would really be nice (tm) if we had someone devoted to developing test suite applications for testing these type of things so that we could be assured of no regressions. Anyone interested in being the test suite go-to person? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/