X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>
Subject:  Re: please test snapshots: we'd like to release cygwin version 1.20
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:21:33 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 18
Message-ID:  <loom.20060222T171523-144@post.gmane.org>
References:  <20060222010657.GA5117@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please <at> cygwin.com> writes:

> 
> Specifically, what needs testing is Corinna's new code which properly
> fills in d_ino into a dirent struct.  I recently found that a samba bug
> caused strange behavior when performing an "ls" or a "find" in a
> directory on a samba share which had more than 128 files.

In an effort to help the testing be easier to perform, I will soon be releasing 
an experimental coreutils-5.94-2 that uses the d_ino member in ls and also 
in /bin/pwd (yes, using readdir()/d_ino in pwd is less efficient than calling 
getpwd(), but it is a nice test of readdir).  Neither coreutils-5.94-1 nor 
findutils-2.27-1 use d_ino at all, so while they do stress readdir, they are 
not very comprehensive test points of the combined readdir/d_ino changes.

-- 
Eric Blake



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/