X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <43FA9336.3080905@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:12:38 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051223 Fedora/1.5-0.2.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Curious about cygcheck -s' comment on vi References: <43FA8F88.4040607@serv.net> In-Reply-To: <43FA8F88.4040607@serv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com L Anderson wrote: > I ran "cygcheck -s" on my system and noticed the comment "Not found: > vi". A search of the web and Cygwin archives seems to indicate that vi > is not a Cygwin package and it doesn't show up in Setup. Therefore, the > comment seems a bit like saying that oat meal is cholesterol free or > "Not found: elephants". :-) > > Just curious. > Curiosity has been known to kill a cat or two. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/