X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:43:52 -0500 From: Bob Rossi To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: mismatched dll Message-ID: <20060203014352.GD17485@brasko.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <020220062158.387.43E28079000ACE870000018322007507440A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> <20060203013712.GC17485@brasko.net> <20060203013842.GB7678@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060203013842.GB7678@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:38:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:37:12PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:58:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: > >>There's always another alternative - propose to maintain your package > >>as part of the official cygwin distribution. Then you just point > >>people to cygwin.com, and source code distribution becomes cygwin.com's > >>problem instead of yours. > > > >OK, here I do have some evidence to support me when I say you are > >partially wrong. > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00064.html So, that is > >not a good alternative. > > I retract my veto. If this is submitted via normal channels, I will have > no objections. Well, I suppose "anything in computer science is [possible], if you are willing to write the code and wait long enough"? Thanks, Bob Rossi -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/