X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:41:29 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: problem with running gdb in cygwin Message-ID: <20060104174128.GC11749@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <8256ea950601040903i6e81bf9cn3edd8f4af0dbb06e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:22:15PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >Krisakorn Rerkrai wrote: >>I have a problem with running gdb in the cygwin. > >>Attached you find cygcheck.out > >Which confirms what cgf said. Upgrade your cygwin dll. And, AFAICT, the OP apparently didn't really read the referenced URL. This seems to be a common occurrence. People apparently think that they are immune from all of the caveats mentioned at http://cygwin.com/problems.html except for the "send cygcheck output". Otherwise, apparently, it's ok to just ignore things like "using a descriptive subject" or "don't start a new thread" or "include a test case". -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/