X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <43ADBA1E.5030907@familiehaase.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:14:06 +0100
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit@familiehaase.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: perl Bundle::Cygwin / perl-bundle-cygwin package
References: <20051222174601.GB3764@efn.org>
In-Reply-To: <20051222174601.GB3764@efn.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:

> I'm working on creating a bundle of common Perl modules that build and
> pass all significant tests on cygwin.
> 
> I hope to have it accepted as a cygwin package.
> 
> Any particular module requests or comment on my proposed names
> for the CPAN bundle or cygwin package?

I'm willing to accept requests for inclusion if there are some really
important modules missing in the main perl distribution tarball, e.g.
XML::Parser is included because some of the Gnome packages needs it and
it is quite stable.

However, Yaakov and Reini have demonstrated that it is not impossible to
create seperate packages for single modules, so why not make each module
its own package?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

