X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:29:19 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: STDOUT of non cygwin command lost - prob started after late Oct snapshot Message-ID: <20051216162919.GA22523@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <200512161534.jBGFY1Dk021811@tigris.pounder.sol.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:15:39PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote: >On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Tom Rodman wrote: >>I'm trying to create a simple test case, but will not be able to finish >>it for a few days; at that time I will followup later with a post that >>follows the problem reporting guidelines. > >Testcase: running windows netstat from xterm (or rxvt) > >$ netstat >shows output in xterm > >$ cmd /c netstat >opens new console > >Workaround: >$ run cmd -wait /c netstat >shows output in xterm I appreciate that people want to provide "FYIs" but it is not likely that anyone will be investigating issues which lack the information that we request in http://cygwin.com/problems.html . cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/