X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:09:03 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock') Message-ID: <20051212130903.GJ17517@calimero.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20051212115420.GH17517@calimero.vinschen.de> <82mzj64hsb.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82mzj64hsb.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Dec 12 13:32, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > >>>>> Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > Could the xemacs maintainer please have a look into that and break > > this down into something which can be handled by a xemacs ignorant? > > I think the OP means emacs and not xemacs. But xemacs has problems with > starting subprocesses as indicated in > > o http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00424.html You *did* read that I checked in a patch this morning which should solve this, didn't you? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00452.html > I will check this evening if I find the snapshot version where it begins > to break. It would be more helpful to actually debug the situation instead of just returning "worked here, didn't work there". Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/