X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:23:01 -0800 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Hang with 20051205 snapshot while building OOo Message-ID: <20051208232301.GA4300@efn.org> References: <43970AD1.8070704@scytek.de> <20051207181550.GA22138@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051207181550.GA22138@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:15:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:16:17PM +0100, Volker Quetschke wrote: > >We got some new features in the hangs with the 20051205 snapshot > >when building OOo. > > > >This trace looks a little bit different from the old versions, > >see thread around , > >but it still hangs. > > It looks different because I took out all of the debugging strace > output that I added to try to track this down. > > I'm convinced that the hang is coming from timeGetTime. That's a > Windows routine and there's not much I can do if a windows routine > decides to take a long time to return. > > So, in other words, I'm admitting defeat in this case, especially since > this isn't a regression from 1.5.18. This is likely to enable a fix or workaround in cygwin, but is it possible that this is restricted to certain brands, models, or revisions of processor? Am I correct in remembering that it happens only on some machines, Volker? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/