X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:01:22 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Error reported dd'ing close of end of block device with skip Message-ID: <20051207100122.GU2999@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Dec 6 15:56, Loh, Joe wrote: > Hello Folks, > Here's the second part of the problem. The follow on from a previous > issue observed as reported in "Size difference reported by > /proc/partitions and lseek(SEEK_END) on block device." Searching the archive http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=htdig&words=dd+eom reveals a thread "Bug in dd ?? at EOM" which starts here: http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2005-09/msg00878.html Btw, have you tried the latest snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ ? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/