X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <20051202111414.GO2999@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20051130171137.GE2999@calimero.vinschen.de> <57A85FA1-5088-4CB9-8998-9853FC0DDBB1@rehley.net> <20051201213806.GM2999@calimero.vinschen.de> <9ED848C7-59B5-4009-BB85-5BCA9F5E3F53@rehley.net> <20051202111414.GO2999@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Peter Rehley Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot (problem with inode numbers) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:34:53 -0800 To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 1 15:38, Peter Rehley wrote: >> On Dec 1, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >>> On Dec 1 13:01, Peter Rehley wrote: >>>> It only appears to be a problem >>>> when I have a mac os x share mounted to a drive on windows. >>>> When I >>>> try with a windows share or a linux share I don't seem to have the >>>> problem. >>>> >>>> The problem that I'm seeing is that the inode value isn't unique >>>> when >>>> listing a directory (or using any program that uses the inode >>>> value). >>> >>> Do I understand you right that this only happens for >>> directories? The >>> normal file inodes are looking ok? >> No, it also happens for files too. > > $%^& > >>> The output of both tests might be helpful. >> Output is attached. > > Well, the volume information looks exactly as usual for a remote Samba > drive. > > The problem is, that your Samba version apparently screws up the inode > information and we have re-enabled using the inode numbers sent from > remote file systems which are supposed to be capable of that. For > this > we use the HAS_PERSISTENT_ACLS property. > > What Samba version is your Mac OS X using? I'm using 3.0.20a for > which > the inode information is useable. Is Samba a part of the OS > packages or > did you install it from an external source? Is it a rather old one? > Can you upgrade? The problem is that there's no way for us to > distinguish > between a newer and an older version of Samba. I would rather not > lose > the inode information when available. > I'm using mac os x 10.4.3 which is using samba version 3.0.10. So it's not that old. However, I did find one reference that implied that mac did something funny for acl's. I'm going to try install a non-apple version of samba and see what happens. > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding > Cygwin to > Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat, Inc. > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/