Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:42:38 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo Message-ID: <20051104184238.GA31828@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4367E903.7080203@scytek.de> <20051101224030.GA30658@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20051102182911.GA9563@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4369185E.8030308@scytek.de> <20051103050000.GA788@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20051103150750.GB3471@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <436A299B.1010506@scytek.de> <436AA157.1070105@scytek.de> <20051104041516.GB27444@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <436B81F8.7050100@scytek.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436B81F8.7050100@scytek.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:44:56AM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >(snip) >>>>>Corinna has informed me that I added the debugging output to the wrong place >>>>>so I'm generating a new snapshot with the right debugging. Please use the >>>>>November 3 snapshot in your tests. >(snip) >> GAH! What a stupid mistake. I made a change and didn't check it. There >> was a reason why there was no debugging statements in the code that I >> modified. >> >> The latest snapshot seems to work. I even (gasp!) tested it. >:) Yes, it works. > >Here is the latest strace: > >Even though it is the correct snapshot I didn't see many of your >debug statements in the strace. Yes. So much for that theory. There's a new snapshot with even more debugging available now. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/