Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:18:35 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo
Message-ID: <20051027171835.GA24332@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <4356A25A.4080204@scytek.de> <20051019205011.GA22512@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4356BF11.1090101@scytek.de> <43579205.1090801@scytek.de> <20051023205044.GA3648@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <435E5839.4070902@scytek.de> <20051025184057.GB19220@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <43610899.8010102@scytek.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43610899.8010102@scytek.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:04:25PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>(BIG-SNIP)
>>>I only paste/attach the 20051024 info, if there is interest I can also send
>>>the 20051023 info.
>>>(snip)
>> 
>> I would like to see the old strace and any other straces you have to see
>> if there's any pattern to something I'm noticing.
>I got a few more, but before spamming this list with straces I have
>some news. "We" managed to reproduce the hangs on that particular
>machine more easily now, but I didn't have the time yet to try
>to reproduce it on my machines. I hope tonight ...
>
>But I can relay the answers to the following questions:
>> I don't see any large times being reported at the beginning of the strace.
>> I'd expect that if you notice the hang, attach to the process, and then
>> do the "ls /proc/<hangpid>/fd".  Can you give me a feel for times of:
>
>First reproducibility: Initially the 20051024 hung every ~ 10 minutes,
>but "now" (At the time I got the email) it is running for more than
>15 hours.
>> 
>> - noticed the problem
>1 min - several hours, then doing ps and cygcheck.
>
>> - attached to process with strace
>5-10 minutes after noticing (max)
>
>> - performed ls
> < 1 min (right after...)

Are you sure that attaching to the process with strace isn't what actually
what caused the process to start up?  I don't see any 1 minute delays in
the strace log.

However, if you could wait for a couple minutes between attaching via
strace and doing the "ls" that might be instructive.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/