Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:44 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo
Message-ID: <20051023205044.GA3648@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <4356A25A.4080204@scytek.de> <20051019205011.GA22512@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4356BF11.1090101@scytek.de> <43579205.1090801@scytek.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43579205.1090801@scytek.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:48:05AM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>Volker Quetschke wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>>>(snip)
>>>Given the number of changes that have been made to cygwin, particularly
>>>in /proc handling, it's very difficult for me to believe that you are
>>>not seeing *any* differences in behavior and
>Well, there are differences in the frequency of occurrence of the hangs.

I missed this the first time.  Are you saying that hangs are more likely
with recent snapshots?

In any event, could you try the 2005-10-22 snapshot?  It doesn't fix anything
but I moved some of the strace printfs around in a probably vain attempt to
see what was hanging.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/