Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:04:41 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: mlockall() and cygwin Message-ID: <20051017090441.GB11091@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20051013123327.GH2908@calimero.vinschen.de> <20051016134754.4556.qmail@web25603.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051016134754.4556.qmail@web25603.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Oct 16 15:47, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote: > Hello, > Is there any similar function in cygwin to avoid > pagging and provide real time ? I have cygwin on Win > XP. Sorry, no. If the application is only going to work on NT anyway, have a look into the MSDN and see the man pages for VirtualLock and SetProcessWorkingSetSize. Otherwise, mlock and munlock still have to be implemented in Cygwin (http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI), mlockall/munlockall probably never will. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/