Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:50:16 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: mlockall() and cygwin Message-ID: <20051013145016.GB6653@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20051013113609.GF2908@calimero.vinschen.de> <20051013121056.6804.qmail@web25607.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20051013123327.GH2908@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051013123327.GH2908@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Oct 13 14:10, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote: >> --- Corinna Vinschen a > >http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR > >> > mlockall will probably never be implemented since >> > there's no support >> > for it on user mode level in Win32. There's support >> > for something like >> > mlock/munlock, but only on NT and it's also not >> > implemented in Cygwin. >> > >> > Try building and running without calling mlockall. >> >> Ist it possible to install eposix on cygwin, and then >> to use mlockall() ? I saw the documentation of eposix, >> and it seems implemented, but I never used eposix. > >Er... how is that supposed to work? eposix is just a library on top >of the underlying OS. It's an eiffel binding for POSIX routines, >nothing else. And apart from that, it doesn't even try to implement >mlockall. POSIX? POSIX? POSIX?! cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/