Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Shankar Unni <shankarunni@netscape.net>
Subject:  Re: popularity-contest for Cygwin?
Date:  Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:56:23 -0700
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <dhk597$8qf$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <jinqj1ll2dnc1d2u18l373o2fjdbohcglt@4ax.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0509301330030.25428@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050908 Thunderbird/1.4 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0509301330030.25428@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> We already have such a tool.  It's called "cygcheck".  When people post
> their cygcheck output to the list, it also contains the list of packages
> they installed.

But not what they are *using*, which seems to be the big thing in 
popularity-contest.

Given that disks are cheap these days, and time is expensive, and 
setup.exe is (as always :-) ) mind-numbing, most users I know just 
install "All" from the top level, always.  Saves a lot of setup-package 
searching later..

But ah, if we could figure out which packages are being *used*, that 
would be fantastic..


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

