Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:50:13 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior  to 1.5.19 release
Message-ID: <20050914035013.GB30032@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20050912222727.GA24998@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4326CC52.7030708@byu.net> <20050913221402.GA24536@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <43279C36.1070405@byu.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43279C36.1070405@byu.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:42:46PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>True, 1.5.18 had the same problem, but 1.5.17 did not.  So it just depends
>on how far back you were looking before calling it a regression :)

Does this ring a bell?

"If you think you've found an error, please indicate whether this is a
regression from 1.5.18."

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

