Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <4312DF32.7080506@vihmapuu.ee> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:10:58 +0300 From: Raul Metsma User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Problems with Windows threads and cygwin sleep() References: <430D688D.1070205@vihmapuu.ee> <430D8FC8.8090906@vihmapuu.ee> <20050825100234.GL17452@calimero.vinschen.de> <430DA017.5000402@vihmapuu.ee> <20050825115019.GP17452@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050825120922.GQ17452@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050825131402.GR17452@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20050825131402.GR17452@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes > No, I tested with just two cmd windows. The joke is that I don't see > the Cygwin process doing anything suspicious. In my test I just started > tcsh under strace to see if it begins to behave weird when the threads > application is running, but it just waits in ready_for_read for user input. > Nevertheless, threads takes the CPU time when the no. of threads is big > enough and returns to normal when the Cygwin process stops. I tried a > few things but no luck so far. Maybe Dave is right. > Some more testing When I comment out signals.cc nanosleep() content and add there directly windows Sleep() call, then does not occur this issue. Could this be nanosleep() bug or something deeper? Raul Metsma -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/