Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Harry Putnam Subject: Re: Emacs from cygwin in X mode with no X running Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:04:47 -0500 Lines: 17 Message-ID: <87br3khh80.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87pss1gc5g.fsf@newsguy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-IsSubscribed: yes ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes: [...] > This can be done easily with XEmacs. You can get an only slightly > stale version (21.4.13) straight out of the box from XEmacs.org [1] > (pick 'native windows'). > > Or you can compile your own 21.4.17 from source, but this is _not_ a > 'straight-out-of-the-box' exercise. If you try this and have trouble, > I'll try to dig out my config.status and other notes from the last > time I made it all work. I _think_ the rebase problems (google > cygwin+xemacs+rebase) have disappeared, but I may be wrong. Very kind of you to offer. However I'm a confirmed fsf emacs user. Tried Xemacs several times but always returned to fsf emacs. Its been my tool of choice for 4-6 yrs now. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/