Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:20:18 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Permissions on .ssh/id_rsa Message-ID: <20050818202018.GA19261@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20050817201613.GA13524@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <4303DDEB.F45A3616@dessent.net> <20050818134424.GA4219@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <20050818184816.GA24529@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Aug 18 12:39, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > >On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > > > >>To me it's just not natural to think of having ntsec without > >>smbntsec. I forget what, if any, issues might have been involved. I > >>can't think of a situation where you'd want Cygwin to honor ntsec but > >>not honor smbntsec... > > > >When the SMB server doesn't reflect the permissions correctly, > > IMHO then that problem should be corrected. That's a good idea. I'm sure the Samba team will happily consider patches. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/