Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: Permissions on .ssh/id_rsa Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:39:18 -0700 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <20050817201613.GA13524@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <4303DDEB.F45A3616@dessent.net> <20050818134424.GA4219@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <20050818184816.GA24529@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050711) In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > >> To me it's just not natural to think of having ntsec without >> smbntsec. I forget what, if any, issues might have been involved. I >> can't think of a situation where you'd want Cygwin to honor ntsec but >> not honor smbntsec... > > When the SMB server doesn't reflect the permissions correctly, IMHO then that problem should be corrected. > or when the owner user on the remote end isn't accessible via Windows > (e.g., mounting a DFS filesystem via SMB). How often does that happen? -- I don't have a solution but I admire the problem. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/