Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: Permissions on .ssh/id_rsa Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:15:04 -0700 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20050817201613.GA13524@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <4303DDEB.F45A3616@dessent.net> <20050818134424.GA4219@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <20050818184816.GA24529@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050711) In-Reply-To: <20050818184816.GA24529@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> X-IsSubscribed: yes Christopher Benson-Manica wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:56:15AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > >> It appears as if your home directory is on the H drive and this is >> mounted from another system. Thus CYGWIN=ntsec does not apply because >> this is a share mounted using SMB. Thus, as I said before, you need >> to set CYGWIN=smbntsec and try again. > > My apologies for missing your earlier reply; the joke is on me, > actually, as your suggestion did the trick - I could have spared > myself some frustration yesterday :-) Anyway, thank you. You're welcome. To me it's just not natural to think of having ntsec without smbntsec. I forget what, if any, issues might have been involved. I can't think of a situation where you'd want Cygwin to honor ntsec but not honor smbntsec... -- What if there were no hypothetical questions? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/