Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:01:36 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: findutils vs. /proc/registry Message-ID: <20050812080136.GL2816@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <42F75183.6010804@byu.net> <20050808133156.GB14783@calimero.vinschen.de> <20050808153351.GE14783@calimero.vinschen.de> <42FC1729.2070904@byu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42FC1729.2070904@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Aug 11 21:27, Eric Blake wrote: > (Even though cygwin just added fts to > the snapshots, find still uses the gnulib version instead because it > claims "the GNU libc and NetBSD versions have bugs and/or unnecessary > limitations.") The Cygwin version is from FreeBSD, which in turn is from OpenBSD. I saw that coreutils also does not even ask for fts(3) being available on the target system, but du(1) is easily patchable, so I used that for testing our new fts(). Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/