Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:22:40 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: rebaseall (temporary?) patch Message-ID: <20050712022240.GE17886@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20050708044418.GA6431@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050711125847.GC3856@tishler.net> <20050712021350.GC17886@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050712021350.GC17886@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:13:50PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:58:47AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >>On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:44:18AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>The below patch to rebaseall will avoid errors when rebasing dlls used >>>by the shell which is executing it. >>> >>>It might be interesting to automatically write a .bat file which >>>performed the final step of renaming the rebased in-use dlls to their >>>correct names but it's too late to do that. >>> >>>[snip] >> >>Thanks for the patch, but I'm leaning towards a simpler solution: >>rebaseall will verify only ash is running and exit if other Cygwin >>processes are running unless an override option (e.g., "-f") is >>supplied. > >So, anyone who installs rebase will also need to install bash. That ash >seems unfortunate to me. It means we can never deprecate ash. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/