Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:08:33 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Perl Win32::Shortcut screws up fork Message-ID: <20050712020833.GB17886@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <7231C15EAC2F164CA6DC326D97493C8BA1C3FA@exchange35.fed.cclrc.ac.uk> <42CDD3B8.69B6AB98@dessent.net> <20050708011859.GB24841@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <42CDD9CB.8390A097@dessent.net> <20050708020511.GA1718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <42CDE3D4.6030507@byu.net> <20050708035038.GB2123@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050711124307.GB3856@tishler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050711124307.GB3856@tishler.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:50:38PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:24:20PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> >But what was wrong with my idea of making rebaseall a #!/bin/ash >> >script? >> >> You still couldn't run the script from bash since the dlls would still >> be loaded. That would mean that you'd have to do something like: >> >> c:\>ash rebaseall >> >> (Currently rebaseall won't work as an ash script but the fix is >> trivial) >> >> I guess that's better than nothing but I still think that just not >> rebasing the bash dlls is going to result in fewer mailing list >> complaints. > >My inclination is to convert rebaseall to an ash script. Once again, let me point out -- that will not solve the problem. You won't be able to run the script from bash, for obvious reasons. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/