Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:10:13 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Unwanted .exe appended to symlinks Message-ID: <20050709161013.GT7507@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1120880636.6400.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42CFD190.2060109@byu.net> <20050709153641.GR7507@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050709153641.GR7507@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Jul 9 17:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 9 07:30, Eric Blake wrote: > > Hmm, while I'm at it, "dirname //" should return //, not /. > > No. // is a perfectly valid root dir in a system which differs between > / and //. Let dirname(1) just use what it gets from dirname(3). As Igor stated on cygwin-talk, we're in violent agreement. I simply misread your statement. Sorry about that. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/