Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:45:35 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Perl Win32::Shortcut screws up fork Message-ID: <20050708034535.GA2123@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <7231C15EAC2F164CA6DC326D97493C8BA1C3FA@exchange35.fed.cclrc.ac.uk> <42CDD3B8.69B6AB98@dessent.net> <20050708011859.GB24841@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <42CDD9CB.8390A097@dessent.net> <20050708020511.GA1718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:21:29PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >> >> >Option B would be to write a C or C++ program to do the job of what >> >rebaseall currently does. That's even more work. >> >> I was going to suggest that but it requires that the user had loaded >> the C compiler which seems like overkill for this. > >I think (hope) Brian meant a C/C++ program to replace the rebaseall bash >script, not that rebaseall produced a C program that would need to be >compiled and run... :-) Right. Duh. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/