Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Resent-From: Christopher Faylor Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:15:23 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <20050617181523.GA6855@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Resent-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:12:38 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: POSIX devices Message-ID: <20050617181238.GK8532@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <42B2687C.4010601@vecernik.at> <42B27E6D.53211BED@dessent.net> <20050617141547.GD8532@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <42B2EDE4.2DEAD79A@dessent.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B2EDE4.2DEAD79A@dessent.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:36:04AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >This, I believe, is an ancient artifact of an old way that the x11 >> >packages used to work, and you can remove this mount. >> >> I don't believe that this mount is optional. /usr/X11RT/lib/X11/fonts >> really does need to be mounted in binary mode. > >I was just basing that on a post I read by Alexander, I have no direct >knowledge on the matter: > Ah. I stand corrected, then. Sorry. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/