Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:31:59 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Any chance to get Apache 2.0.xx working on cygwin?
Message-ID: <20050617003159.GB12614@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <508734440@web.de> <20050616212135.GB11157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <6.2.1.2.0.20050616201649.03b4a988@pop.prospeed.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050616201649.03b4a988@pop.prospeed.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:21:11PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>At 05:21 PM 6/16/2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Andreas Eibach wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>>>I'm glad that someone finally suggested this.  I think a few more
>>>>messages along these lines would have surely kick started a mean
>>>>response from me.
>>>
>>>Pity it didn't come.  I would have been able to answer accordingly,
>>>mind you.  I cannot understand why you are always so short-tempered if
>>>someone reports a problem.  But if you want war, you get war if need
>>>be.
>>
>>Can't talk now.  I'm digging trenches.
>
>I hope you're using ht://Dig!

Ooooooohhhh...   Ouuuuccchhhhh...

I think Larry needs a gold star for most on-topic and painful pun.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/