Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: "Krzysztof Duleba" Subject: Re: Making /bin/sh == bash. Has the time come? Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:15:39 +0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20050610150729.GA13181@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050610231343.6A12713C0A7@cgf.cx> <20050611003817.GB1106@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <004701c56f79$1eb791c0$d119fea9@pcdahl4201> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Thorsten Dahlheimer wrote: > Are you sure you didn't actually measure bash's performance twice? Yes, you're right. I didn't set CONFIG_SHELL. I feel really stupid about it :-( I only copied bash to /bin/sh. At the moment my CPU load is high, so it's not the best time to run benchmarks, but MC configure results are similar. I'll rerun the full tests later. Thanks for pointing that out. Regards Krzysztof Duleba -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/