Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:22:06 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: gcc 3.4.4 optimization problem (was Re: Negative stats from rsync with 20050610 snapshot) Message-ID: <20050612082206.GB6568@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <42AA611A.2050605@acm.org> <20050611145713.GA11065@calimero.vinschen.de> <42AB16FA.4000701@familiehaase.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42AB16FA.4000701@familiehaase.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Jun 11 18:53, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Otherwise, do you know by any chance, if there exists some fix for that > >problem? The above kludge is almost a year old, so there's a chance > >that somebody already found the fix. > > Where we had a problem was with -fschedule-insns2 > (flag_schedule_insns_after_reload): Oh, right. > Regarding unit-at-a-time I cannot remember right now if there was > discussion, there are known issues with this option, anyway I will > apply your kludge since I have not much time, I'm on a business trip > the next two weeks. I'm wondering if we should do that or not. I'm not a gcc person, so I'm not exactly the right one to make such a decision. It's just interesting that the strict-aliasing problem Chris found, is no problem in gcc 4 anymore, apparently. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/