Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:20:52 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Performance problems Message-ID: <20050605012052.GA6138@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4297A14B.9070409@plausible.org> <20050528131501.V53507@logout.sh.cvut.cz> <20050528160424.GB12395@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <429ED094.9080001@tlinx.org> <20050602172226.GC6597@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <42A2246D.3090000@tlinx.org> <20050605005508.GA2706@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050605005508.GA2706@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:55:08PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >I merely represented our current thinking about the subject that you >raised. Oh, on rereading this thread, I remembered that the main reason that I responded at all was that Igor suggested SHTDI and PTC. I thought it behooved me to let people know that we're already actively discussing caching implementations in cygwin. I didn't want anyone to be tempted to go off and start working on a caching implementation when we're already discussing implementation details. So this is one of those rare cases where we've already got S TDI and a P to be TC may be imminent. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/