Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <429F885F.1010801@etr-usa.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:29:51 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: Drop Win9x support? (was: Serious performance problems) References: <14CEE0B69DBDFC41A192613D8B4098CA016595AB@XCH-CORP.staktek.com> In-Reply-To: <14CEE0B69DBDFC41A192613D8B4098CA016595AB@XCH-CORP.staktek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Terry Dabbs wrote: > > I am supporting applications requiring cygwin on '95 and '98 that are > not going away anytime soon. That's fine, but do you really need new functionality? Again, I'm not saying "delete all Cygwin binaries that support Win9x". I'm saying "stop requiring Win9x compatibility in new binaries". -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/