Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <429F7678.1050302@familiehaase.de> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:13:28 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) References: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D03E04FD3@exchange.timesys.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Robb, Sam wrote: >>Is there any reason why the cygwin DLL couldn't be built >>twice: once for Win9x, and once for WinNT-based systems? >> >>Aside from potential installation issues ("install this >>version of the DLL under 9x, that version under NT), it >>seems like this would be a reasonable optimization. > As long as we're mulling over ideas... Alternatively, we could drop Win98 support. Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/