Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <20050602154308.93531.qmail@web31706.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sunil <funtoos@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?)
To: Linda W <cygwin@cygwin.com>
In-Reply-To: <429ED094.9080001@tlinx.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

> amusingling enough -- their
> execution times are *slower* than cygwin's...  Of

this is a joke right? I found SFU to be at least 2-3
times faster in loading and executing programs in
general. Its too bad their POSIX imple. is less than
half baked and unuseable for building any package
OOTB.

> course MS might have 
> deliberately used non-optimized methods for their
> services to convince
> people to recode for the Win32 interface (and thus
> benefit by increased
> Win32 lockin).

this might be famously true.

-Sunil


		
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/