Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:03:07 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Updated: tetex-3.0.0-3 - now missing texi2html which is *mandatory* for Cygwin DLL build Message-ID: <20050512050307.GA2298@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20050512033545.GD25511@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4282D5D2.6090903@msa.hinet.net> <4282DA3D.9020607@msa.hinet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4282DA3D.9020607@msa.hinet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:23:25PM +0800, Shaddy Baddah wrote: >Allow me to correct myself before someone else does. > >Shaddy Baddah wrote: >>My interpretation is drawn from the fact that the default make target >>does make a call to texi2html, and therefore will fail. > >I am doubly wrong :-(, because it will/does not fail. The exit status >of the texi2html call is ignored. > >... also, I spelt moot wrong in the original post. > >I am a little embarrassed by this foray into the Cygwin mailing list >:-(, hopefully I can make up for it in the future with positive >contributions. No need to beat yourself up. Although I've had a run of misreading of email lately both here and (more embarrassingly) with customers at work, so I know how you feel. We all make mistaks. It's how we lern. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/