Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 13:13:10 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux Message-ID: <20050504171309.GT24661@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20050504162931.2282.qmail@web30206.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:50:14PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >----Original Message---- >>From: Peter Farley >>Sent: 04 May 2005 17:30 > >> WHOA there. I think we have a slight failure to >> communicate. I am NOT the OP, I was just chiming in >> on the conversation > > Oops, so you are! Umm, I mean, "So you aren't!" Ermmm.. guess I mean >"Pardon me for not checking!" Ditto. I even went back to check the original posting and didn't notice the different From:. That's embarrassing. Sorry. The points are still valid, ", however. I don't see any reason to raise global concerns about makefile interoperability with linux just because one person has a trivially-solveable problem with a couple of makefiles. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/