Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:15:07 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Removal of hard links with count > 1 for files that are in use
Message-ID: <20050429121507.GX2572@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <7387-2005-0429-145620-15796@fep34.kolumbus.fi> <004201c54cb3$3b9b2f10$2d00000a@wsmap>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <004201c54cb3$3b9b2f10$2d00000a@wsmap>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Apr 29 15:01, Marcus Picasso wrote:
> $ ln /bin/rm.exe ./foo.exe
> 
> $ /bin/rm.exe -f ./foo.exe
> rm: cannot remove `foo.exe': Permission denied
> 
> Is this expected behaviour? 

I was surprised, too, but the answer is "apparently yes".  Trying to
remove the hardlink results in an ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED from the Win32
calls.  Go figure.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/