Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:34:50 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: mkstemp bug
Message-ID: <20050428053450.GA23599@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20050428022934.GC31448@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050428042527.6DF0113C1C8@cgf.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050428042527.6DF0113C1C8@cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:26:32PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>>>>fifos just barely work under cygwin.  I wouldn't recommend using them.
>>>
>>>Yes, it appears that they are heavily broken.
>>
>>So when I say "fifos just barely work" you felt the need to inform me
>>that they don't work?  And that advances the discussion how, exactly?
>>
>
>And your pathological touchiness serves what purpose exactly?  Take
>your meds already.  Christ.

By the way, I think I've previously implied that I don't appreciate the
use of this kind of profanity here.

I would appreciate it if you would refrain from using this type of
language in the cygwin mailing lists.

Re: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg00299.html

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

