Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 07:49:50 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: findutils still broken
Message-ID: <20050422114949.GB16791@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <042120052015.18583.426809E50001CC150000489722070009530A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> <20050421202823.GB4887@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050422083750.GC7692@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050422083750.GC7692@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 10:37:50AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 21 16:28, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:15:33PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>>   I
>> >originally wrote this program to discover that inode reporting in
>> >readdir() is broken (to which you replied that fixing it would cause
>> >too much of a slowdown),
>> 
>> Yes, both Corinna and I had potential "fixes" (neither being a complete
>> fix) for this in our sandboxes but they didn't make it into 1.5.15.
>> Corinna got this working for >=XP which means that it wouldn't be right
>> only on NTFS file systems on NT3.5, NT4, and NT2K.  I just was going to
>> get rid of the inode field entirely because, as you'd previously said,
>> any well-designed software would adapt to the lack of that field.
>
>I'm not sure this presumption is correct.  The d_ino field is not marked
>as optional in SUSv3, it's marked as an XSI extension.  The crux with
>XSI extensions is that (quote SuSv3) "Application writers may confidently
>make use of an extension on all systems supporting the X/Open System
>Interfaces Extension."  This covers practically every serious system in
>the POSIX world right now.  If we drop d_ino, I'd expect another round
>of suddenly broken applications.

If there are programs out there which rely on d_ino then they are broken
on cygwin right now and have been for some time.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

