Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: "Hans Horn" Subject: Re: Bash 3.0? Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:21:23 -0700 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <1110278641.5672.33.camel@cft125.cinnober.com> <20050308111419.GC2839@cygbert.vinschen.de> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p1.almaden.ibm.com X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-IsSubscribed: yes Sounds like bash is currently up for grabs? If that is so, I'd like to volunteer. I've been running bash 3.0 (patch level 16) w/o any complaints. greets, Hans Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 8 11:44, Johannes Keukelaar wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> Whatever happened with Bash 3.0 for Cygwin? Can't find anything in >> the archives after http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg01305.html >> Is this still in the pipeline? Any idea how long it will take? > > The maintainer apparently disappeared. If you want to take over bash > maintainership, see http://cygwin.com/setup.html > > Corinna -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/