Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:28:33 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 20050208 snapshot = yay! (Was: Re: hyperthreading fix, try #1) Message-ID: <20050209192833.GB2260@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:27:34PM -0500, Rolf Campbell wrote: >Rolf Campbell wrote: >>This test does fail (in the same way) on non-hyperthreaded machines >>(Win2000Pro on a PIII). But, this is a regression from 1.5.12 (that >>test runs fine on the non-HT machine with 1.5.12. There was (maybe >>still is) a problem with running "make -j" without the max task counter, >>but "make -j2" has always worked very well on non-ht machines. >> >>I will try out some other snapshots and see if I can narrow down the >>time when this showed up later today. >> >>-Rolf > >I've tried yesterday's snapshot with my test-case, and with my real >build system. So far, things look very good. If that's the case, then you can thank Corinna. She found a bug in my code. In my defense, however, causing the problem required her to go to the tremdous effort of running something that she called a "cygwin test suite". Duh. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/