Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak Subject: Re: bash: tab completion failure from (but not at) / Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 19:58:04 -0500 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <200502080725.j187Pf0S024993@mx1.redhat.com> <20050208084415.GJ19096@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: toronto-hse-ppp3944319.sympatico.ca User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: <20050208084415.GJ19096@cygbert.vinschen.de> X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: goc-cygwin@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 8 07:19, fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net wrote: >>Recent remarks ("I have an idea about how to fix the race but it would >>introduce a destabilizing change that I'd rather not chance before 1.5.13 is >>released") suggest that an updated cygwin1.dll might be imminent. >>Please could I mention a minor but annoying glitch described along with >>Corinna's immediate and effective fix at >>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-05/msg00449.html but which has >>re-emerged in recent snapshots, at least since >>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-12/msg00838.html, in which Corinna >>records her perplexity ("weird") at this re-emergence. >>Things worked properly in snapshot 20041222 but fail from 20041223. > Nevertheless, that's a bash problem. Is our bash maintainer still around? Yep, still here.. I'll have a look at what your patch in Bash is up to tomorrow (still don't have a Windows machine at home) but it should be compiled in - there's no reason why it wouldn't be: the only thing I haven't changed is a fix for http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01517.html. I'll report back when I've checked (ping me if that doesn't happen in 24 hours - I'm rather busy lately...) rlc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/